Golder v. Golder
Citations
- 102 Kan. 486
- 170 P. 803
- 1918 Kan. LEXIS 73
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Gift — Execution of Deed-HJndue Influence — Evidence. Evidence relating' to the validity of a deed to a farm examined, and held sufficient to show that the deed was a lawful gift, that the grantor acted intelligently, independently-, and of her own volition, and free from undue ^ influence on the part of the grantee.</p> <p>2. Same — Incompetent Witness■ — Deposition Taken by Opposite Party— Incompetency Waived. Where the plaintiffs take the deposition of the defendant grantee of a deed which is assailed on the grounds that the grantor was mentally incompetent to make it and that she had made it through the undue influence of the grantee, and where such deposition is filed in court by the plaintiffs, but not offered in evidence by them, the taking of defendant’s deposition by the plaintiffs is a waiver of objections to his testimony, and the deposition may properly be read in evidence on behalf of the defendant grantee.</p>
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-04-12· cited 21×
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1952-01-07· cited 20×
- Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-07-05· cited 13×
- Toelle v. Sells-Floto Shows Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1922-06-10· cited 6×
- Clark v. StrasburgCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-02· cited 4×
- Gerard v. CostinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-06-09· cited 3×
- Harth v. De ShazoSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-11-04· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.