Skip to main content
· 5/2/2007

Golden v. Vickery

Citations

  • 645 S.E.2d 695
  • 285 Ga. App. 216
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1417
  • 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing cases finding breach of ministerial duty in failure to follow established policy or procedure and cases finding discretion to act in the absence of established guidelines
  • affirming summary judgment and holding that a statute did not create ministerial duties concerning safety of high voltage power lines because the owner or operator had discretion as to what safeguards are necessary
  • city worker’s decision to insulate high-voltage electric lines rather than to relocate or de-energize them held discretionary because state law gives worker discretion as to what method to use
  • “A discretionary act calls for the exercise of personal deliberation and judgment, which in turn entails examining the facts, reaching reasoned conclusions, and acting on them in a way not specifically directed.”
  • discussing various lines of authority on this point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Johnson, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.