Golden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[R]ule 3.800(a) prohibits the filing of such a motion during the pendency of a direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vanover v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 5×
• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-01· cited 3×
• Pacheco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-09· cited 1×
• KASIM MCDONALD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-02
• BENITO TORRES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-17
• MATTHEW STROJEK v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-01-04
• Ventura v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-20
• Howard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-19
• Meader v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-27
• Dennewitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Day v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-09· cited 12×
• Hines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-16· cited 4×
• Goggins v. Pinellas County, Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-19· cited 2×