Skip to main content
· 2/8/1965

Golden State Lanes v. Fox

Citations

  • 232 Cal. App. 2d 135
  • 42 Cal. Rptr. 568
  • 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disputed transac- tion held to be a loan when the supposed lessor was bound to fully reconvey the property upon repayment of the sum it had initially advanced to the supposed lessee
  • disputed transac- tion held to be a loan when the supposed lessee received $150,000 to fund a construction project, was then obligated to pay $30,000 per year for eight years (i.e., interest
  • disputed transaction held to be a loan when the supposed lessee was “unconditionally obli gated” to make periodic payments and “absolutely bound” to repay an identical sum that had been advanced to it at the outset of the transaction
  • disputed transaction held to be a loan when the supposed lessee was “unconditionally obligated” to make periodic payments and “absolutely bound” to repay an identical sum that had been advanced to it at the outset of the transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fleming

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.