GOLDEN PEANUT COMPANY, LLC v. ROSS EDWARD MASON MILLER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Rule 39(b) grants wide discretion to the federal courts in considering untimely jury demands,” a discretion that “must be exercised in the context of the interest asserted”
• noting the important role that expert medical testimony plays in presenting a deliberate indifference claim
• granting a new trial and appointing counsel for an incarcerated plaintiff bringing a deliberate indifference to medical needs claim
• “Quite often No. 05-1620 31 the factual and legal issues in a civil case are more complex than in a criminal case.”
• the motion was made by blind, pro se litigant and was only nineteen days late
• “it is still necessary to include some ‘well-pleaded factual allegations’ to support the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).