Golden Pacific Bancorp and Miles P. Jennings, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Given that Henry has not satisfied § 2254(d), the 16 district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Henry’s request for an evidentiary 17 hearing.”
• “Given the highly regulated nature of the banking industry, ... the [federal regulators’ seizure of the bank] could not possibly have interfered with a reasonable investment-backed expectation on the part of Golden Pacific.”
• fifth amendment's Due Process Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).