Golden Door Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters Non-Marine Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding section 13-217 does not pertain to remands and reinstatement of a case after remand does not constitute the filing of a new action
• declining to construe an order denying reinstatement as a dismissal for want of prosecution where dismissal for want of prosecution would trigger the parties’ right to reinstate within one year, “undermining the trial court's clear intention to dismiss with prejudice”
• “We believe that the existence of a duty to [reinstate] implies the existence of a time limitation within which to [reinstate].”
• indicating a 23- month delay in reinstatement was extraordinary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).