Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that misrepresentations about profitability of business made recklessly with intent to deceive supported award of punitive damages
• holding that the defendant’s failure to disclose important information about low customer traffic constituted fraud sufficient to justify rescission of a contract
• stating that we review challenges to legal conclusions by determining whether the law was correctly applied to the facts
• stating that when a 9 party is challenging a conclusion of law, the standard of review is whether the law was 10 correctly applied to the facts, viewing the facts in the manner most favorable to the 11 prevailing party, and disregarding all evidence and inferences to the contrary
• rescission of a contract is an equitable remedy that is tried to the court without a jury
• rescission of a contract is an equitable remedy that is tried to the court without a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).