Golden Blount, Inc. v. Robert H. Peterson Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that incompetent opinions of counsel and surrounding facts are properly considered evidence of willfulness
• noting that, although it was proper for the district court to amend its findings upon a timely filed motion under Rule 52(b), “the district court on its own motion could have granted relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(6
• “[N]othing in the record suggests that either [defendant] or any end-user ignored the instructions . . . .”
• upholding district court’s finding that defendant contributorily infringed patent claim for a “fireplace assembly” by supplying a component of the assembly
• affirming the district court’s finding of willfully induced infringement where the defendant was on notice of infringement prior to the start of litigation but continued infringing conduct and only sought advice from counsel after the commencement of litigation
• affirming judgment of willful infringement based in part on induced infringement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).