Skip to main content
· 1/13/1998

Golden Apple Management Co. v. GEAC Computers, Inc.

Citations

  • 990 F. Supp. 1364
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225
  • 1998 WL 21695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a response denying a request for admission constituted “other paper” under § 1446(b)
  • giving significant weight to the plaintiff’s settlement demand where the plaintiff’s letter included specific details, such as a statement that damages included “software costs, consultant costs and personnel costs which amount to $105,432”
  • “The issue in this action [is] whether Geac can be charged with knowledge of removability of the action prior to receipt of plaintiffs response to the request for admission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.