Goldblatt v. Doerty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding unreasonableness where the parents “explicitly refused to attend any subsequent meetings” midway through the IEP process and their communications “reflect[ed] their complete unwillingness to cooperate”
• parents have a “right to provide meaningful input,” not a “right to dictate an outcome” (quotation omitted)
• “[T]he motion for summary judgment is simply the procedural vehicle for asking the judge to decide the case on the basis of the administrative record.” (quoting Heather S. ex rel. Kathy S. v. Wisconsin, 125 F.3d 1045, 1052 (7th Cir. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).