Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the supreme court intended the Lucas factors as an aid in determining whether the nonclient is a third-party beneficiary”
• discussing the connection between the Lucas balancing test and the third-party beneficiary theory
• assertion that party did not subjectively intend to release all claims does not affect the release without a showing of mutual mistake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).