Gold v. Dubish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the benefit-of-the-bargain rule was \designed for situations where the transaction between the parties has actually been consummated based on the fraudulent representation\
• concluding that the benefit-of-the-bargain rule was “designed for situations where the transaction between the parties has actually been consummated based on the fraudulent representation”
• holding that the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims for damages based on promissory estoppel because the allegations were sufficient to state a cause of action based on promissory estoppel
• holding that the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs' claims for damages based on promissory estoppel because the allegations were sufficient to state a cause of action based on promissory estoppel
• in jurisdiction applying same rules for measuring damages, plaintiff may not recover lost profits where “defendants’ alleged fraudulent misrepresentations did not ultimately induce plaintiff to consummate the bargain”
• “an award of damages based on lost profits may be appropriate in a promissory estop-pel case when such an award is necessary in order to do complete justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).