Gold v. Cosper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that even testimony by qualified experts is inadmissible where opinions are “not founded on a sufficient knowledge of [the subject’s] background”
• remarking that even testimony by qualified experts is inadmissible where opinions are “not founded on a sufficient knowledge of [the subject’s] background”
• “limited and superficial contact” with subject area failed to evidence requisite “significant skill and knowledge” required to testify as an expert
• “limited and superficial contact” with subject area failed to evidence requisite “significant skill and knowledge” required 17 to testify as an expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).