Gold Development & Management, LLC v. P.J. Contracting Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding claim should be dismissed because “it makes only a general allegation of interference with customers without any sufficiently particular allegation of interference with a specific contract or business relationship”
• “There is no reason ... to provide greater protection to the media in defamation suits than to others exercising their freedom of speech.”
• “There is no reason ... why the Constitution should be construed to provide greater protection to the media in defamation suits than to others exercising their freedom of speech”
• claim dismissed where plaintiffs “ma[de] only a general allegation of interference with customers without any sufficiently particular allegation of interference with a specific contract or business relationship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).