Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing plaintiff’s argument that an expanded search was inadequate and holding that “[w]hile these facts could indicate” that the searches were “overbroad, they do not serve to undermine the adequacy . . .” of the searches
• de nying discovery even as to plaintiffs’ limited request regarding the adequacy of the defendant Board’s search for responsive records where plaintiff had not shown bad faith by defendants
• “[S]traightforward factual recounting of a meeting . . . detailing what each of the participants said . . . [wa]s not properly . . . withheld under Exemption 5.” (emphasis in original)
• “[E]ven if an internal discussion does not lead to the adoption of a specific government policy, its protection under Exemption 5 is not foreclosed as long as the document was generated as part of a definable decision-making process.”
• “[E]ven if an internal discussion does not lead to the adoption of a specific government policy, its protection under Exemption 5 is not foreclosed as long as the document was generated as part of a definable decision-making process.”
• “[E]ven if an internal discussion does not lead to the adoption of a specific government policy, its protection under Exemption 5 is not foreclosed as long as the document was generated as part of a definable decision-making process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).