Golba v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a holder claim is asserted by a stockholder who allegedly relied on the misrepresentations to its detriment, arid that damages are specific to that plaintiff's reli- anee
• “[Plaintiff] seeks to recover the value it might have realized from selling its shares during a period when it chose to hold, under hypothetical market conditions (assuming disclosures different from those actually made
• under New York’s out-of-pocket rule, “[t]he true measure of damages [for fraud] is indemnity for the actual pecuniary loss sustained as the direct result of the wrong” (citations and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).