Golanty v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant had “met its burden on the affirmative defense by pointing to the absence of anything in the record regarding [plaintiff’s interactions with the alleged discriminator] within the statute of limitations period”
• discussing how the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that “discriminatory animus” drove the adverse employment action
• discussing how the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that “discriminatory animus” drove the adverse employment action
• discussing how the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that “discriminatory animus” drove the adverse employment action
• describing the similarly situated requirement as follows: \the employer [hired] someone outside the protected group who was not better qualified than the plaintiff.\
• asking whether the employer’s proffered rationale “was phony or intended to cover up more nefarious motives”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).