Goins v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 334
Syllabus
<p>1. New Trial.—An application for new trial, based on newly-discovered testimony, must show that it is material and likely to affect the verdict, and must show due diligence or excuse want of diligence to obtain it on the trial.</p> <p>2. Alibi.—It seems that a defendant cannot excuse want of diligence in obtaining evidence to prove an alibi.</p> <p>3. Witness under the bule.—It is within the discretion of -the District Court to permit a witness who had been under the rule, and who had been discharged and had been at large, to be recalled to explain his testimony.</p>
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 1965-03-31· cited 219×
- Farris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1888-10-10· cited 8×
- Creswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1883-04-18· cited 1×
- Bronson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- McMillan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
- Bybee v. WadlingtonTexas Commission of Appeals· 1882-07-01
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.