Goings v. Court Services & Offender Supervision Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that requiring CSOSA to hold a “post-risk assessment hearing” “may be acceptable” for due process purposes, but finding that plaintiff was not given a meaningful opportunity to be heard “before, during or after the initial risk assessment”
• granting preliminary injunction where plaintiff's substantive due process claim premised on no-contact order prohibiting communication with his children likely would not survive strict scrutiny review
• granting preliminary injunction where plaintiff's substantive due process claim premised on no-contact order prohibiting communication with his children likely would not survive strict scrutiny review
• granting preliminary injunction where plaintiff’s substantive due process claim premised on no-contact order prohibiting communication with his children likely would not survive strict scrutiny review
• “CSOSA remains free to re-impose conditions ... at any point in the future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).