Skip to main content
· 12/10/1890

Going v. Dinwiddie

Citations

  • 86 Cal. 633
  • 25 P. 129
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1082

Syllabus

<p>False Imprisonment by Justice ofthe Peace—Acts of Judicial Officer —Punishment for Contempt— Pleading — Excess of Jurisdiction. — A complaint against a justice of the peace for false imprisonment in punishing the plaintiff for contempt must aver, in terms, that the acts constituting the imprisonment were without or in excess of his jurisdiction, or facts from which a want of jurisdiction appears.</p> <p>Id. — Pleading — Conclusions of Law. — The allegations that the acts constituting such imprisonment were done “ wrougfully ” or “ unlawfully ” are of mere conclusions of law, and tender no issue, where no facts are averred to show the acts complained of to he wrongful or unlawful.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • one-year suspension with conditions for reinstatement for violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.