Goin v. Commission on Ethics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether facts, as found in recommended order of hearing officer, violate a rule or statute is a question of ultimate fact which an agency may not reject if supported by substantial competent evidence
• holding that whether facts, as found in recommended order of hearing officer, violate a rule or statute is a question of ultimate fact which an agency may not reject without adequate explanation
• considering but rejecting public employee’s challenge to the facial constitutionality of the ethics statute he was found to have violated in the final order and public report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).