Skip to main content
· 7/26/1917

Goico v. Pueblo

Citations

  • 25 P.R. Dec. 915
  • 1917 PR Sup. LEXIS 655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the evidence of the requisite intent was sufficient given that the appellant had no reason for leaving, lived in various locations, and was apprehended by civilian authorities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.