Skip to main content
· 9/24/1915

Gogol v. Baltimore & O. R.

Citations

  • 226 F. 224
  • 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • breach-of-contract case where a written order accepted by the defendant railway company was determined to be \an instrument in writing for the payment of money\ that the court found was subject to interest computed from the date on which the right to the moneys was determined to exist
  • breach-of-contract case where a written order accepted by the defendant railway company was determined to be “an instrument in writing for the payment of money” that the court found was subject to interest computed from the date on which the right to the moneys was determined to exist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dayton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.