Gognat v. Ellsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accrual date is a question of fact for the jury
• accrual date is\ a question\ of’fact for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Interest of A.R
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13· cited 676×
• Marquez v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2013-09-23· cited 20×
• Giduck v. Niblett
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-07-03· cited 18×
• Tarco, Inc. v. Conifer Metropolitan District
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 14×
• Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-08-16· cited 12×
• Walshe v. Zabors
  D. Colorado· 2016-04-18· cited 3×
• McGillis Investment Company v. First Interstate Financial Utah LLC
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13· cited 1×
• McGillis Investment Company, LLP v. First Interstate Financial Utah LLC
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13· cited 1×
• In re Rumnock v. Anschutz
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-12-05· cited 1×
• Insulet Corp. v. Eoflow, Co. Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2026-05-28

Other cases named Gognat v. Ellsworth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• GOGNAT v. Ellsworth
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-09-17· cited 333×