Goggin v. Ratchford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing King on the basis that the Court of Appeals in that case was reviewing the trial court’s grant of a motion to suppress rather than its denial of a motion to suppress
• distinguishing King on the ground that the “arresting officer . . . did not observe any suspicious actions,” given that “[t]he defendant had merely been standing outside late at night with another individual in an area known for drugs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).