Skip to main content
· 10/15/1901

Goforth v. Stingley

Citations

  • 79 Miss. 398

Syllabus

<p>1. Ejectment. Billo/particula/rs. Code 1892, \\ 1652. Amendment. Delay.</p> <p>In ejectment it is not reversible error to deny plaintiff’s application to amend liis bill of particulars of title under code 1892, $ 1652, regulating the subject, where the same was made after the jury was impaneled and after undue delay, without explaining the delay or submitting the amendment proposed to the court.</p> <p>2. Same. Evidence.</p> <p>The statute, code 1892, $ 1652, expressly confines the parties in an action of ejectment, where they have filed such bills, to the evidence specified in their bills of particulars of title.</p>

Judges: Cali, Ioon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.