Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 7/29/1985

Goforth v. Owens

Citations

  • 766 F.2d 1533
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal is warranted upon a “clear record of delay or willful contempt and a finding that lesser sanctions would not suffice”
  • observing that the district court “would also have been justified in dismissing this action under Rule 16(f) . . . to punish counsel for his disregard of the court’s orders to submit a preliminary statement” after affirming sanction of dismissal
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Goforth v. Owens

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.