Goff v. Southmost Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where lending institution’s name was inadvertently typed in the space for the borrower’s name, the mistake was in the expression of the contract and parol evidence was admissible to prove the parties’ intent
• reforming the contract when lending institution’s name was typed in the space for the borrower

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).