Goff v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that puzzle pleading—“a complaint that forces the defendants or court to sort out the alleged statements and match them with the corresponding adverse facts to solve the puzzle of interpreting Plaintiffs claims”— abuses Rule 8’s principles
• “[B]ecause Defendants’ statements 20 are literally true . . . the court finds these statements, as alleged, would not plausibly mislead 21 a reasonable investor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).