Goetz v. Hand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Defendant’s argument against typicality for failure to present evidence of previous title insurance “is essentially another way of saying that plaintiffs legal theory is wrong,” and refusing to adjudicate the merits of the underlying case at the class certification stage
• finding predominance for the claim under Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices Act
• granting class certification on, inter alia, money had and received claim
• both cases certifying class in similar case against title insurance company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).