Goettsch v. Heidman Law Firm LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss attacks the legal sufficiency of the complaint
• finding a court will grant a motion to dismiss if “the plaintiff should be denied relief as a matter of law given the facts alleged.”
• action for wrongful termination under AEPA brought against corporation and its agents held viable where agents attempted to extort property from plaintiffs
• “We begin our analysis with the statute ... our foremost goal is to discern and give effect to legislative intent.”
• “[T]he Attorney General’s Opinion does not constitute precedent regarding statutory construction. Opinions of the Attorney General are due our respect, but are advisory and not binding.”
• “In discerning legislative intent, we look to the statute’s policy, the evil it was designed to address, its words, context, subject matter, and effects and consequences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).