Goel v. Heller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To say they are not in privity is to suggest that a father is not privy to his son”
• “[T]he question of privity does turn on the status of certain individuals and entities—questions of fact—the question of privity is really one of law.”
• “One cannot invoke ‘John Doe’ to avoid res judicata and relitigate claims ad nauseum when in large measure the acts and statements complained of and litigated in Goel I were those of Heller and Edgette. In a word, privity aside, Heller and Edgette were parties.”
• “[C]o-conspirators are by definition in privity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).