Goehring v. Chapman University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of a motion for a new trial when the jurors, all answered in the negative when asked if they would be distracted after the September 11 attacks
• “The question of whether a regulatory statute creates a private right of action depends on legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).