Skip to main content
· 2/6/2004

Godwin v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development

Citations

  • 356 F.3d 310
  • 360 U.S. App. D.C. 15
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1823
  • 2004 WL 221321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the private action authorized by FHA . . . constitutes an adequate alternative remedy, rendering judicial review unavailable under the APA”
  • explaining that it is unlikely that Congress would create an implicit private right of action when “enacting a statute that creates federal obligations,” given that “agency action can normally be reviewed by a district court pursuant to its federal question jurisdiction”
  • FHA confers no cause of action against HUD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.