· 5/19/1955
Godwin v. Carrigan
Citations
- 87 S.E.2d 471
- 227 S.C. 216
- 1955 S.C. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the provision for exclusivity “contemplates that the exclusiveness shall only apply to those cases or situations which are embraced within the machinery of the condemnation statutes.”
- noting mandamus is employed to compel performance, when refused, of a ministerial duty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Stukes, Taylor, Oxner, Legge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.