Skip to main content
· 5/19/1955

Godwin v. Carrigan

Citations

  • 87 S.E.2d 471
  • 227 S.C. 216
  • 1955 S.C. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the provision for exclusivity “contemplates that the exclusiveness shall only apply to those cases or situations which are embraced within the machinery of the condemnation statutes.”
  • noting mandamus is employed to compel performance, when refused, of a ministerial duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Stukes, Taylor, Oxner, Legge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.