Godfrey v. Faulkner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff stated a claim for civil conspiracy 28 where the complaint alleged conduct, including “disclosing confidential information that would benefit [the defendants] to the detriment of [the plaintiffs]”
• providing that under Pennsylvania law, piercing the corporate veil is not an independent cause of action
• stating that “a joint venturer owes a fiduciary duty of the utmost good faith and must act toward his associate with scrupulous honesty”
• recognizing the permissibility of asserting a promissory estoppel claim and breach of contract claim simultaneously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).