· 11/28/1958
Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc. v. Watson
Citations
- 262 F.2d 34
- 104 U.S. App. D.C. 322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that courts deciding motions to compel apply a \standard similar to that applicable for a motion for summary judgment\
- classifying John Hancock's suggestion that presumption in favor of arbitration applies as \dicta\
- “In the context of motions to compel arbitration ..., the court applies a standard similar to that applicable for a motion for summary judgment.”
- “[T]he summary judgment standard is appropriate in cases where the District Court is required to determine arbitrability.”
- “In the context of motions to compel arbitration brought under the [FAA], the court applies a standard similar to that applicable for a motion for summary judgment.”
- “[T]he summary judgment standard is appropriate in cases where the District Court is required to determine arbitrability, regardless of whether the relief sought is an order to compel arbitration or to prevent arbitration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.