Godesa A. Bomate v. Ford Motor Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal with prejudice where the plaintiff refused to cooperate with her lawyers resulting in repeated delays to discovery deadlines and trial dates
• upholding dismissal of action for want of prosecution where the plaintiff’s lack of diligence and non-compliance with court directives caused repeated discovery and trial delays
• affirming dismissal where a plaintiff failed to cooperate with her lawyers and failed to comply with a pretrial order, and where the trial court warned plaintiff of the consequences of further delays in the pretrial process
• “A Rule 41(b) dismissal is proper if, in view of the entire procedural history of the case, the litigant has not manifested reasonable diligence in pursuing the cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).