District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/13/1983

Goddard v. State

Citations

438 So. 2d 110
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where language of statute is plain, resort to rules of statutory construction is unnecessary to glean intent of Legislature
where language of statute is plain, resort to rules of statutory interpretation is unnecessary to ascertain intent as Legislature held to have intended that which is plainly expressed
where language of statute is plain, resort to rules of statutory interpretation is unnecessary to ascertain intent as Legislature held to have intended that which is plainly expressed
Where the language of the statute is plain, resort to rules of statutory interpretation is unnecessary to ascertain intent as the Legislature is held to have intended that which is plainly expressed.
Where the language of a statute is plain, resort to rules of statutory construction and interpretation is unnecessary to ascertain the legislative intent as the Legislature is held to have intended that which is plainly expressed.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, Thompson, Wentworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.