Goddard v. Irby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting right as existing as of the time house is sold, with the adjoining property vacant, and not as coming into being at some later time
• where “common grantor could not have conveyed an easement in [appellee’s] property with the sale of a house on the [appellant’s] lot” an implied easement did not arise
• trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for defendant on nuisance claim when plaintiff’s only assertion of nuisance was that construction of the townhouses on neighboring lot would lead to an increase in traffic congestion in front of his property
• trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for defendant on nuisance claim when plaintiff’s only assertion of nuisance was that construction of the townhouses on neighboring lot would lead to an increase in traffic congestion in front of his property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).