Goddard v. Google, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “affirmative defenses routinely 18 serve as a basis for granting Rule 12(b)(6) motions where the defense is apparent from the face of 19 the [c]omplaint”
• noting that “affirmative defenses routinely 20 serve as a basis for granting Rule 12(b)(6) motions where the defense is apparent from the face of 21 the [c]omplaint”
• noting that “affirmative defenses routinely serve as a basis for granting Rule 3 4 12(b)(6) motions where the defense is apparent from the face of the [c]omplaint.” (internal quotation 5 marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).