Skip to main content
· 5/1/1987

Godchaux v. Conveying Techniques, Inc.

Citations

  • 660 F. Supp. 220
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating same and explaining that “[c]ourts consider such transfers to be [upon death] by their very nature, because the donors are not regarded as having divested themselves of the property at the time of the transfer, since they retain the right to the enjoyment of the income”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livaudais

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.