Gochenour v. J. P. Morgan & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for a party to prevail on newly discovered evidence, it “must have been previously unavailable”
• observing that, to serve as a basis for altering or amending a judgment, newly discovered evidence “must have been previously unavailable”
• noting that a motion to alter or amend the judgment may be granted -3- Case No. 19-3243, Goodwin v. Richland Cnty. 59(a), (e
• stating that a movant under Rule 59(e) cannot succeed on an argument of manifest injustice if the only error it seeks to correct is a “poor strategic decision”
• listing the four grounds for relief and including both “an intervening change in controlling law” and “manifest injustice”
• finding under Ohio law that follow form \language ... phrased in the conjunctive\ incorporated one underlying policy's exclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).