Skip to main content
· 9/13/1965

Gober v. Baker

Citations

  • 239 Ark. 692
  • 393 S.W.2d 620
  • 1965 Ark. LEXIS 1060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because expert testimony on issue was unnecessary, the proffered testimony did not preclude summary judgment
  • holding that because expert testimony on issue was unnecessary, the proffered testimony did not preclude summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.