· 9/13/1965
Gober v. Baker
Citations
- 239 Ark. 692
- 393 S.W.2d 620
- 1965 Ark. LEXIS 1060
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because expert testimony on issue was unnecessary, the proffered testimony did not preclude summary judgment
- holding that because expert testimony on issue was unnecessary, the proffered testimony did not preclude summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.