Gobell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court's revocation of Gobell's probation was proper because, even if his contentions were correct, his revocation was based on two offenses and he challenged only one
• trial court's revocation of Gobell's probation was proper because, even if his contentions were correct, his revocation was based on two offenses and he challenged only one
• “Since the other finding upon which probation was revoked is unchallenged, 7 appellant’s contention, even if correct, would not show an abuse of discretion.”
• “Since the other finding upon which probation was revoked is unchallenged, appellant’s contention, even if correct, would not show an abuse of discretion.”
• “Since the other finding upon which probation was revoked is unchallenged, appellant’s contention, even if correct, would not show an abuse of discretion.”
• “Since the other finding upon which probation was revoked is unchallenged, appellant’s contention, even if correct, would not show an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).