· 3/6/1996
Gobbo Farms & Orchards, a Colorado Partnership v. Poole Chemical Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation Authorized to Do Business in the State of Colorado
Citations
- 81 F.3d 122
- 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 682
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3889
- 1996 WL 96417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Rule 41(a) doesn’t apply “to dismissal of less than all claims in an action”
- explaining that plaintiff could not voluntarily dismiss one of its claims because Rule 41(a) “speaks to dismissal of an action, not just a claim within an action”
- finding that Rule 41(a) “speaks to dismissal of an action, not just a claim within an action” and finding no authority “to support [the plaintiff’s] contention that Rule 41(a) applies to dismissal of less than all claims in an action”
- Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) “speaks to dismissal of an action, not just a claim within an action.”
- Rule 41(a) does not permit dismissal of less than all claims in an action
- “[Plaintiff] offers no authority, and we have found none, to support its contention that Rule 41(a)[, Fed. R. Civ. P.,] applies to dismissal of less than all claims in an action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Logan, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.