Skip to main content
· 3/6/1996

Gobbo Farms & Orchards, a Colorado Partnership v. Poole Chemical Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation Authorized to Do Business in the State of Colorado

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 122
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 682
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3889
  • 1996 WL 96417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 41(a) doesn’t apply “to dismissal of less than all claims in an action”
  • explaining that plaintiff could not voluntarily dismiss one of its claims because Rule 41(a) “speaks to dismissal of an action, not just a claim within an action”
  • finding that Rule 41(a) “speaks to dismissal of an action, not just a claim within an action” and finding no authority “to support [the plaintiff’s] contention that Rule 41(a) applies to dismissal of less than all claims in an action”
  • Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) “speaks to dismissal of an action, not just a claim within an action.”
  • Rule 41(a) does not permit dismissal of less than all claims in an action
  • “[Plaintiff] offers no authority, and we have found none, to support its contention that Rule 41(a)[, Fed. R. Civ. P.,] applies to dismissal of less than all claims in an action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Logan, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.