Goad v. Hambridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the Act precludes claims of spouse of injured worker for negligent infliction of emotional distress
• employee injured when he reached his hand inside a planer whose safety mechanism had been disabled
• employee injured when he reached his hand inside a planer whose safety mechanism had been disabled
• employer’s knowledge that any injury was potential was insufficient evidence that an injury was certain to occur as required by Birklid
• no deliberate intent where employer was advised of machine’s potential for serious injury and failed to advise employee of those concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).