Go v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the applicant did not show that his drug trafficking offense had some political aspect or political objective
• noting that Go “explicitly admitted under oath to being involved in a scheme to finance ‘drug transactions’”
• noting that the “lack of harm to similarly situated family members . . . generally undercuts an alien’s fear of harm”
• explaining that “serious reasons to believe” is equivalent to probable cause
• explaining that “serious reasons to believe” is equivalent to probable cause
• stating that while “country reports con-tainted] generalized evidence suggesting a relatively high level of mistreatment and abuse” in the country of removal, the “specific circumstances” of the petitioner’s case did not indicate that he would be harmed or mistreated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).