Gnesys, Inc. v. Boyd B. Greene, Individually, and D/B/A Greene & Associates, and Greene & Associates, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that § 1117(a) “concerns false representation by those engaged in commerce” and “is not limited to trademark issues” (citing Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 28–29 (2003))
• noting that “compliance with the notice of appeal rule is a jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend” (citation and brackets omitted)
• applying § 1117(a) to contempt proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).